Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Mahalick, 06-2567

Conviction and sentence for various firearm offenses are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the government violated his right to a fair trial by withholding material and favorable evidence; 2) a federal agent misled the grand jury by failing to disclose "exculpatory" evidence; 3) the government suborned perjury by directing an officer to testify falsely at trial; 4) the district court erred by imposing a sentence enhancement for transferring a gun with reason to believe it would be used in another felony offense; and 5) the sentencing judge engaged in double counting.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/04/2007
  • Decided 08/13/2007
  • Published 08/13/2007

Judges

  • WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before KANNE, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Patrick Nagle (argued), Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Stanley L. Hill (argued), Hill & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard