United States Seventh Circuit
US v. Mahalick, 06-2567
Conviction and sentence for various firearm offenses are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the government violated his right to a fair trial by withholding material and favorable evidence; 2) a federal agent misled the grand jury by failing to disclose "exculpatory" evidence; 3) the government suborned perjury by directing an officer to testify falsely at trial; 4) the district court erred by imposing a sentence enhancement for transferring a gun with reason to believe it would be used in another felony offense; and 5) the sentencing judge engaged in double counting.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/04/2007
- Decided 08/13/2007
- Published 08/13/2007
Judges
- WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before KANNE, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Patrick Nagle (argued), Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Stanley L. Hill (argued), Hill & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.