Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Segal, 05-4601

Convictions and sentence on multiple counts of financial fraud, racketeering and tax evasion are affirmed, but a restitution order for a racketeering conviction is vacated and remanded where it was not clear from the record how much of the funds was poured back into the enterprise and how much went to benefit a defendant personally, thus the court could not determine whether at least part of the forfeiture constituted double billing.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/12/2007
  • Decided 08/02/2007
  • Published 08/02/2007

Judges

  • EVANS, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • David E. Bindi (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Marc W. Martin, Chicago, IL, Albert W. Alschuler (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.
Copied to clipboard