Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Santiago, 06-3193

Sentence for drug and weapons charges is affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) any fact that increased his sentence had to be found beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury; 2) the district court was required to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he had participated in an earlier, uncharged murder because these findings resulted in a considerable increase in his sentence; 3) the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation; 4) the evidence was insufficient to support the district court's finding that he had participated in the murder; and 5) the sentence was unreasonable.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/01/2007
  • Decided 08/02/2007
  • Published 08/02/2007

Judges

  • RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, MANION and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Amarjeet Singh Bhachu (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Kent R. Carlson (argued), Carlson & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard