United States Seventh Circuit

In a suit alleging fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of contract against a pharmacy benefit manager by a company formed to facilitate contracts between pharmacy benefit managers and organizations seeking administrators for their prescription benefit plans, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) defendant failed to demonstrate the existence of a valid contractual obligation; 2) defendant failed to raise a genuine issue of fact as to fraudulent intent; and 3) plaintiff failed to create a genuine issue of fact as to the element of wrongdoing necessary to support its claim of unjust enrichment.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/02/2006
• Decided 07/13/2007
• Published 07/13/2007

Judges

• RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE and MANION, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David A. Novoselsky (argued), Novoselsky & Associates, Paul A. Caghan, Chicago, IL, Chicago, IL, Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Frank E. Pasquesi, Michael S. Baig (argued), Foley & Lardner, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.