United States Seventh Circuit
US v. Ratliff-White, 06-1960
Conviction for wire fraud is affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) there was a fatal variance between the fraud alleged in the indictment and that proved at trial; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; and 3) the prosecution introduced improper propensity evidence.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/28/2006
- Decided 07/10/2007
- Published 07/10/2007
Judges
- WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, MANION and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Rick D. Young (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Stephanie A. Brennan (argued), Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.