Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Ratliff-White, 06-1960

Conviction for wire fraud is affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) there was a fatal variance between the fraud alleged in the indictment and that proved at trial; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; and 3) the prosecution introduced improper propensity evidence.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/28/2006
  • Decided 07/10/2007
  • Published 07/10/2007

Judges

  • WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, MANION and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Rick D. Young (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Stephanie A. Brennan (argued), Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard