United States Seventh Circuit

In a contract dispute involving the provision of reorganization services to a bank, summary judgment for defendant-bank is affirmed where the clear and unambiguous language of the contract stated that the obligation to pay did not arise after analysis or presentation of reorganization recommendations, but only after an actual change was implemented.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/19/2007
• Decided 06/07/2007
• Published 06/07/2007

Judges

• KANNE, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James P. Fenton (argued), Eilbacher Fletcher, Fort Wayne, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Max W. Hittle (argued), Greg A. Small, Krieg Devault, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.