Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Hendrix, 05-3644

Conviction and sentence for distributing at least fifty grams of crack cocaine are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; 2) he was entitled to a missing witness jury instruction after the confidential informant failed to testify; 3) the government improperly used the confidential informant; and 4) his sentence was unreasonable based on a disparity between sentences for powder and crack cocaine.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 12/01/2006
  • Decided 04/09/2007
  • Published 04/09/2007

Judges

  • MANION, Circuit Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and RIPPLE and MANION, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Matthew Getter (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Allan A. Ackerman (argued), Robert A. Willis, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard