United States Seventh Circuit
US v. Hendrix, 05-3644
Conviction and sentence for distributing at least fifty grams of crack cocaine are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; 2) he was entitled to a missing witness jury instruction after the confidential informant failed to testify; 3) the government improperly used the confidential informant; and 4) his sentence was unreasonable based on a disparity between sentences for powder and crack cocaine.
Appellate Information
- Argued 12/01/2006
- Decided 04/09/2007
- Published 04/09/2007
Judges
- MANION, Circuit Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and RIPPLE and MANION, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Matthew Getter (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Allan A. Ackerman (argued), Robert A. Willis, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.