Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


Krieg v. Seybold, 06-2322

In a suit alleging Fourth Amendment and due process violations brought by a former city employee who was terminated after refusing to submit to a random drug test, summary judgment for the city is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff performed a safety sensitive job such that the city's interests outweighed the plaintiff's expectation of privacy; and 2) plaintiff was an at-will employee who did not have a property interest in his job for purposes of due process.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/17/2007
  • Decided 03/21/2007
  • Published 03/21/2007

Judges

  • FLAUM, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, KANNE, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • William R. Groth (argued), Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth & Towe, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Robert T. Keen, Jr., Diana C. Bauer (argued), Carson Boxberger, Fort Wayne, IN, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard