United States Seventh Circuit
Krieg v. Seybold, 06-2322
In a suit alleging Fourth Amendment and due process violations brought by a former city employee who was terminated after refusing to submit to a random drug test, summary judgment for the city is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff performed a safety sensitive job such that the city's interests outweighed the plaintiff's expectation of privacy; and 2) plaintiff was an at-will employee who did not have a property interest in his job for purposes of due process.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/17/2007
- Decided 03/21/2007
- Published 03/21/2007
Judges
- FLAUM, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, KANNE, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- William R. Groth (argued), Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth & Towe, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Robert T. Keen, Jr., Diana C. Bauer (argued), Carson Boxberger, Fort Wayne, IN, for Defendants-Appellees.