United States Seventh Circuit
US v. Stitman, 05-2277
Sentence for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) it was not clear error for the sentencing judge to enhance defendant's sentence for creating the appearance that he "brandished or possessed" a dangerous weapon; 2) the court did not err in calculating defendant's criminal history; and 3) the judge understood her discretion to take the full range of the section 3553 factors into account during sentencing.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/09/2006
- Decided 01/10/2007
- Published 01/10/2007
Judges
- WOOD, Circuit Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and WOOD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Daniel Collins (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gerardo S. Gutierrez (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.