United States Seventh Circuit
Mommaerts v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 06-2952
Summary judgment for an ERISA plan in a suit over denial of benefits is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for default judgment since defendant's excusable neglect did not cause prejudice and default judgment would constitute a pointless windfall for plaintiff.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/08/2007
- Published 01/08/2007
Judges
- EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER and MANION, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jeanine Lea Mommaerts, Green Bay, WI, pro se.
- For Appellees:
- Eric C. Tostrud, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.