Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Hook, 06-1362

Order to submit to DNA collection while serving a term of supervised release for wire fraud, money laundering and theft is affirmed over petitioner's numerous constitutional arguments, as well as his legal claims that: 1) the DNA collection was an impermissible modification of his term of supervised release; 2) the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider his request for termination of supervised release; and 3) the imposition of the DNA collection requirement violated a contract he entered into with the United States at the time he was sentenced to a term of supervised release.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/13/2006
  • Published 12/13/2006

Judges

  • MANION, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, MANION, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • David E. Bibdi (argued),Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Michael B. Cohen (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard