Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


U.S. v. Van Eyl, 05-1785

Grant of a new trial in a case involving multiple financial charges is affirmed where the court was not convinced that the trial court was mistaken when it determined that there was a reasonable possibility that a prosecutor's mistaken violation of an in limine order during his closing statements had a prejudicial effect upon the jury's verdict.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/08/2006
  • Decided 10/02/2006
  • Published 10/02/2006

Judges

  • ROVNER, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David E. Bindi, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Terence H. Campbell, Cotsirilos, Tighe & Streicker, Ronald D. Menaker, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard