United States Seventh Circuit
U.S. v. Van Eyl, 05-1785
Grant of a new trial in a case involving multiple financial charges is affirmed where the court was not convinced that the trial court was mistaken when it determined that there was a reasonable possibility that a prosecutor's mistaken violation of an in limine order during his closing statements had a prejudicial effect upon the jury's verdict.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/08/2006
- Decided 10/02/2006
- Published 10/02/2006
Judges
- ROVNER, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David E. Bindi, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Terence H. Campbell, Cotsirilos, Tighe & Streicker, Ronald D. Menaker, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.