United States Seventh Circuit
Kaba v. Stepp, 03-3531
Summary judgment for defendants because of plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in a suit alleging violation of the Eighth Amendment is reversed and remanded where there are disputed issues of fact about whether administrative remedies were "available" to defendant.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/30/2005
- Decided 08/16/2006
- Published 08/16/2006
Judges
- WOOD, Circuit Judge., Before ROVNER, WOOD, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David W. Fuller (argued), Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- David S. Baker, Peter Maharry (argued), Fisher, Patterson & Smith, Overland Park, KS, for Defendant-Appellee, E.A. Stepp., Frederick J. Hess (argued), Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, Belleville, IL, for Defendant-Appellee, M. Laird., Carl Gallagher, McAnny, Van Cleave & Phillips, Kansas City, KS, for Defendant-Appellee, Captain Benson., A. Courtney Cox, Hart & Hart, Benton, IL, for Defendants-Appellees, Joseph Yonkman.