Shell v. US, 04-3890
Denial of motion under 18 U.S.C. 2255 asserting ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed where counsel was not objectively deficient in omitting certain arguments since: 1) a bug in a prison visitor's ID badge did not violate the Fourth Amendment; 2) Title III application and warrant were not defective; and 3) the government did not mislead a judge in seeking a warrant.
- Argued 02/21/2006
- Decided 05/23/2006
- Published 05/23/2006
- MANION, Circuit Judge., Before MANION, WOOD, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellant:
- H. Ron Davidson (argued), Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Edward Siskel (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Respondent-Appellee.