Aurora Loan Servs., Inc. v. Craddieth, 05-1858
Dismissal of motion to intervene in a foreclosure action is reversed and remanded for further proceedings where: 1) the intervening buyer had standing to sue; 2) the court would have jurisdiction over the intervention; 3) the court's dismissal left several issues unexplored; and 4) the court's rationale for dismissal was invalid for policy reasons.
- Argued 10/24/2005
- Decided 03/31/2006
- Published 03/31/2006
- POSNER, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Elizabeth K. Meyers, Fisher & Fisher, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff., Arthur W. Friedman (argued), Miller, Shakman & Hamilton, Chicago, IL, for Intervenor-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Andrew R. Greene (argued), Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.