Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. Randall, 03-2089, 03-2129

Defendants' sentences for conspiring to commit extortion are affirmed where they have not presented relevant evidence to rebut the presumption that their sentences, which were properly within the calculated guideline range, were reasonable when imposed.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/12/2005
  • Published 08/12/2005

Judges

  • KANNE, Circuit Judge., Before KANNE, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Scott Drury, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Richard M. Beuke, Chicago, IL, John T. Moran, Jr., Moran & Associates, Chicago, IL, Sean P. Burke, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, for Defendants-Appellants.
Copied to clipboard