United States Seventh Circuit
MATZ v. HOUSEHOLD INT'L TAX, 03-4344, 03-4345
In determining whether an ERISA pension plan has been partially terminated, there is a rebuttable presumption that a 20 percent or greater reduction in plan participants is a partial termination.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/05/2004
- Published 11/05/2004
Judges
- POSNER, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Joseph A. Morris (argued), Morris, Rathnau & Delarosa, Chicago, IL, Noel P. Goudreau, Kubasiak, Cremieux, Fylstra, Reizen & Rotunno, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant., Deborah C. Saxe (argued), Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Los Angeles, CA, Luke Degrand, Degrand & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.