United States Seventh Circuit

Defendant's claim for post-petition service expenses expended after plaintiff's bankruptcy is denied where the bankruptcy court properly found that defendant had consented to the treatment of its post-petition claim as an unsecured administrative expense.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/12/2004
• Decided 09/13/2004
• Published 09/13/2004

Judges

• CUDAHY, Circuit Judge., Before CUDAHY, COFFEY and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Arthur G. Jaros, Jr. (argued), Richter & Jaros, Oak Brook, IL, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Richard G. Smolev (argued), Kaye Scholer, New York, NY, for Trustee-Appellee.