WARD v. HINSLEY, 03-4342
A federal habeas court may not review procedurally defaulted claims of alleged structural errors when the petitioner has not argued that the procedural default is excused by cause and prejudice or that a fundamental miscarriage of justice will result if the claims are not addressed.
- Argued 05/18/2004
- Decided 07/28/2004
- Published 07/28/2004
- FLAUM, Chief Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and KANNE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Stephen E. Eberhardt (argued), Tinley Park, IL, for Petitioner-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Marie Quinlivan Czech, Janet C. Mahoney (argued), Office of the Cook County State's Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Respondent-Appellee.