Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


WITZKE v. FEMAL, 02-2648

Plaintiff successfully challenged his sentence, as the district court prematurely dismissed the complaint by failing to allow the pro se litigant more opportunity to demonstrate whether any other any administrative remedies were available.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/09/2004
  • Decided 07/22/2004
  • Published 07/22/2004

Judges

  • RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Margaret J. Schneider (argued), Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Hillary A. Schwab (argued), Office of the Attorney General, Madison, WI, James E. Culhane, Tyson Ciepluch (argued), Davis & Kuelthau, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard