United States Seventh Circuit

Defendant ATM repair man unsuccessfully challenged his conviction under 18 U.S.C. Section 656 for stealing in excess of $1000 from ATM's on the grounds the statute did not apply to him because he was not "an agent employee of, or connected in any capacity with" with the victim bank.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/26/2004
• Decided 06/25/2004
• Published 06/25/2004

Judges

• KANNE, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, POSNER, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Winfield D. Ong (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Thomas M. Weinland (argued), Frazier & Associates, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.