SHULA v. LAWENT, 03-3194
Defendants blatantly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Because the court never awarded costs to the debt collectors, plaintiff was never obligated to pay these costs; defendant's letter demanding payment of these costs as a debt violated sections 1692e and 1692f(1), while failure to send a follow-up letter violated section 1692g(a).
- Argued 01/21/2004
- Decided 02/26/2004
- Published 02/26/2004
- POSNER, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellees:
- Michael S. Hilicki (argued), Beeler, Schad & Diamond, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Paul D. Lawent (argued), pro se, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.