Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


TAPIA v. ASHCROFT, 02-2827

There is substantial evidence to support the immigration court's conclusion that plaintiff was ineligible for suspension of deportation because he had not been present in the U.S. for seven consecutive years, including substantial evidence showing that the Order to Show Cause why he should not be deported was properly served.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/16/2003
  • Published 12/16/2003

Judges

  • WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, MANION, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Kurt Yahn,Sternberg & Associates, Chicago, IL, Martin Schwartz (argued), Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • George P. Katsivalis, Office of the District Counsel, Chicago, IL, Richard M. Evans, Nancy E. Friedman (argued), Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard