United States Seventh Circuit

Enforcement of NLRB's order of reinstatement denied where its finding that petitioner violated 29 U.S.C. sections 158(a)(1) and (a)(3) by firing three employees for their protected union activities was not supported by substantial evidence.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/31/2003
• Decided 11/17/2003
• Published 11/17/2003

Judges

• MANION, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE, and MANION, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Todd D. Steenson,Holland & Knight, Tamra S. Domeyer (Argued), Exelon Business Services Company, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner Sears, Roebuck & Company in 02-2504., John R. McIntyre (Argued), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Rochelle Kentov, National Labor Relations Board, Region 12, Tampa, FL, for Petitioner NLRB in 02-2651.


• For Appellees:
  
• Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Region 13, Chicago, IL, John R. McIntyre (Argued), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent NLRB in 02-2504., Todd D. Steenson, Holland & Knight, Tamra S. Domeyer (Argued), Exelon Business Services Company, Chicago, IL, for Respondent Sears, Roebuck & Company in 02-2651.