United States Seventh Circuit

In an environmental action brought in response to a bridge project, the district court's judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where defendants considered a sufficient number of reasonable alternatives and explored them to the extent necessary, and there was no improper segmentation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/05/2003
• Published 11/05/2003

Judges

• RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Robert B. Corris, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles A. Guadagnino, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, Frank D. Remington, Office of the Attorney General, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellee.