United States Seventh Circuit
WILLIAMS v. SENIFF, 02-1231
An assistant police chief did not have a protected First Amendment right to make certain statements to the press, thus his claim of termination in retaliation for the exercise of protected speech must fail; plaintiff failed to produce evidence of a conspiracy to violate his federally-protected rights.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/20/2003
- Published 08/20/2003
Judges
- RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, ROVNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Donald E. Werthheimer (argued), South Bend, IN, for plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Peter J. Agostino (argued), Anderson, Agostino & Keller, Thomas M. Dixon (argued), Dixon, Wright & Associates, South Bend, IN, Wayne E. Uhl, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for defendants-appellees.