Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


WILLIAMS v. SENIFF, 02-1231

An assistant police chief did not have a protected First Amendment right to make certain statements to the press, thus his claim of termination in retaliation for the exercise of protected speech must fail; plaintiff failed to produce evidence of a conspiracy to violate his federally-protected rights.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/20/2003
  • Published 08/20/2003

Judges

  • RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, ROVNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Donald E. Werthheimer (argued), South Bend, IN, for plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Peter J. Agostino (argued), Anderson, Agostino & Keller, Thomas M. Dixon (argued), Dixon, Wright & Associates, South Bend, IN, Wayne E. Uhl, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for defendants-appellees.
Copied to clipboard