Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. HERNANDEZ, 99-2299

Challenges by eight defendants, to various aspects of drug conspiracy convictions and sentences, are all rejected, including admission of drug sale evidence and evidence relating to gang violence.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/15/2002
  • Decided 06/03/2003
  • Published 06/03/2003

Judges

  • KANNE, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Madeleine S. Murphy (argued), Office of U.S. Attorney, Chicago, IL, for U.S., Nathan Diamond-Falk (argued), Chicago, IL, for Abraham Hernandez., Steven Shobat (argued), Ronald J. Clark, Clark & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Orlando Diaz., Steven Shobat (argued), Richard H. Parsons, Office of Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Wilfredo Hernandez., Douglas P. Roller (argued), Clayton, MO, for Sandy Garvin., Antonio Rosario, Bradford, PA, pro se., Steven Shobat (argued), John A. Meyer, Chicago, IL, for Roosevelt McMullen., Steven Shobat (argued), Chicago, IL, for Samuel Santana., Nathaniel Cade, Jr., Michael Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, WI, for Carl Stevenson.

Copied to clipboard