United States Seventh Circuit

Defendant's claims that (1) the IJ incorrectly interpreted the "stop time" rule, (2) the BIA abused its discretion in denying her motion to reconsider and remand her application for asylum, and (3) she was denied due process of law because her claim for asylum was never heard, are all without merit, due primarily to her failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/07/2003
• Decided 05/02/2003
• Published 05/02/2003

Judges

• COFFEY, Circuit Judge., Before COFFEY, ROVNER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Richard H. Trais (argued), Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.


• For Appellees:
  
• George P. Katsivalis, Dept. of Homeland Sec., Office of the Dist. Counsel, Chicago, IL, Richard M. Evans, Paul Fiorino (argued), Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.