United States Seventh Circuit

Mail fraud convictions based on a loans-for-deposits scheme met the requirements under 18 U.S.C. sections 3292(2) and 3293(2), and are affirmed. The district court properly computed losses from the scheme for sentencing purposes.

Appellate Information

• Argued 10/31/2002
• Decided 02/20/2003
• Published 02/20/2003

Judges

• TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge., Before RIPPLE, MANION, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David A. Glockner(argued), Office of U.S. Attorney, Crim. Div., Chicago, IL, for U.S., Matthias A. Lydon (argued), Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, for John Serpico., Jeffrey Schulman (argued), Wolin & Rosen, Chicago, IL, Donald Hubert, Hubert, Fowler & Quinn, Chicago, IL, for Gilbert Cataldo.