United States Seventh Circuit

Incriminating statements, which may have resulted from "interrogation" of defendant, were correctly admitted, because subsequent statements (identical to those at issue) were clearly voluntary, and independent evidence overwhelmingly supported a conviction for aggravated bank robbery.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/11/2002
• Decided 06/18/2002
• Published 06/18/2002

Judges

• KANNE, Circuit Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, KANNE, and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Bart Huff (argued), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Div., Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellee., Joel A. Brodsky (argued), Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellant.