US v. TRAEGER, 01-2154
In appeals from bank robbery convictions, no Brady violation occurred where appellant waived any claim that the government suppressed an immunity agreement with a key witness; counsel's "unreasonably passive" representation and failure to seek separate trials for two robberies did not amount to ineffective assistance.
- Argued 04/01/2002
- Decided 05/08/2002
- Published 05/08/2002
- TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge., Before EASTERBROOK, DIANE P. WOOD, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellees:
- David E. Bindi (Argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Criminal Division, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Joshua G. Vincent (Argued), Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.