United States Seventh Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. BRITTON, 01-2074

In appeals from convictions for mail fraud, 1) sufficient evidence established intent to defraud, 2) attorney's motion to withdraw based on knowledge that he possessed and could use to impeach a government witness was appropriately denied where that information was easily provided by records and through cross-examination, and 3) exclusion of expert testimony was harmless where proffered testimony only addressed counts on which appellant was acquitted.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/07/2001
  • Decided 05/08/2002
  • Published 05/08/2002

Judges

  • KANNE, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Scott A. Verseman (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Rockford, IL, for United States., Corey B. Rubenstein (argued), Stetler & Duffy, Chicago, IL, for Sheila Britton.

Copied to clipboard