Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


IENCO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 01-2395

Federal malicious prosecution claims should be examined under due process clause directly rather than under a theory of substantive due process; summary judgment affirmed as against city but reversed as to individual officers, for a determination of their entitlement to qualified immunity.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/13/2002
  • Decided 04/12/2002
  • Published 04/12/2002

Judges

  • WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge., Before COFFEY, MANION, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jeffrey N. Cole (argued), Cole & Staes, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Mara S. Georges, Marc J. Boxerman (argued), Office of the Corp. Counsel, App. Div., Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard