United States Seventh Circuit

While plaintiff's impairment may preclude her from performing an aspect of her job, she has the ability to perform numerous other job's tasks, and she presented no support for the theory that her physical impairment precludes her from working in a broad class of jobs; thus, plaintiff failed to demonstrate she was "disabled" within the meaning of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/05/2001
• Decided 03/21/2002
• Published 03/21/2002

Judges

• COFFEY, Circuit Judge., Before COFFEY, ROVNER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• George C. Pontikes, argued, Pontikes & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Edward J. Messina, argued, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.