United States Seventh Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. BOLDEN, 01-2340

Defendant who did not attempt to flee jurisdiction or avoid apprehension, but who failed to appear for judicial proceeding, engaged in obstructive conduct that justified an upward adjustment of his sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 12/11/2001
  • Decided 01/31/2002
  • Published 01/31/2002

Judges

  • RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Ricardo Meza (argued), Office of U.S. Atty., Crim. Div., Chicago, IL, for U.S., Jonathan M. Minkus (argued), Abrams & Minkus, Skokie, IL, for Charles Bolden.

Copied to clipboard