US v. BOLDEN, 01-2340
Defendant who did not attempt to flee jurisdiction or avoid apprehension, but who failed to appear for judicial proceeding, engaged in obstructive conduct that justified an upward adjustment of his sentence.
- Argued 12/11/2001
- Decided 01/31/2002
- Published 01/31/2002
- RIPPLE, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Ricardo Meza (argued), Office of U.S. Atty., Crim. Div., Chicago, IL, for U.S., Jonathan M. Minkus (argued), Abrams & Minkus, Skokie, IL, for Charles Bolden.