United States Seventh Circuit

FERC may set different rules for allocating a pipeline's additional capacity than those for setting minimum and maximum tariff rates for the gas received from the pipeline.

Appellate Information

• Argued 04/18/2001
• Decided 01/11/2002
• Published 01/11/2002

Judges

• DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge., Before WOOD, JR., DIANE P. WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Philip B. Malter (argued), Malter & Mickum, Riva, MD, for Petitioners., Katherine P. Yarbrough, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Washington, DC, for Intervenors-Petitioners Process Gas Consumers Group, American Iron and Steel Institute and International Paper Co., Frederick T. Kolb, BP Amoco Corp. Houston, TX, for Intervenors-Petitioners Amoco Production Co. and Amoco Energy Trading Corp., David I. Bloom, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Washington, DC, for Intervenor-Petitioner Northern Illinois Gas Co., Sarah E. Tomalty, Dynegy Marketing & Trade, Washington, DC, for Intervenor-Petitioner Dynegy Marketing and Trade.


• For Appellees:
  
• Timm L. Abendroth (argued), Monique Penn-Jenkins, Dennis Lane, FERC, Washington, DC, for Respondent., Paul W. Mallory (argued), KN Energy Inc., Office of the General Counsel, Lombard, IL, for Intervenor-Respondent.