Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


ISAACS v. SPRINT CORP., 01-8016

A case involving different conveyances by and to different parties made at different times over a period of more than a century in 49 different jurisdictions which have different laws is not a case in which class action treatment is obviously appropriate, so the court must engage in Rule 23 analysis.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/14/2001
  • Published 08/14/2001

Judges

  • POSNER, Circuit Judge., Before POSNER, EASTERBROOK, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Gordon R. Broom (submitted), Burroughs, Hepler, Broom, MacDonald & Hebrank, Edwardsville, IL, J. Emmett Logan, Morrison & Hecker, Kansas City, MO, for Petitioner., Daniel J. Millea, Zelle, Hofmann, Voelbel & Gette, Minneapolis, MN, for John H. Isaacs., Mark C. Goldenberg, Hopkins & Goldenberg, Edwardsville, IL, for Kenneth Poor.

Copied to clipboard