Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


MURRY v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTH., 99-3774

Denying proposed travel arrangements does not significantly affect job responsibilities or benefits and is therefore not a tangible employment action, nor are policy changes that affect a large class of employees and are not directed toward plaintiff specifically.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/16/2001
  • Decided 05/10/2001
  • Published 05/10/2001

Judges

  • COFFEY, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and COFFEY and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Edward T. Stein, Chicago, IL, David A. Novoselsky, Kevin S. Besetzny (argued), Novoselsky & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Nina G. Stillman (argued), Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard