United States Seventh Circuit
MURRY v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTH., 99-3774
Denying proposed travel arrangements does not significantly affect job responsibilities or benefits and is therefore not a tangible employment action, nor are policy changes that affect a large class of employees and are not directed toward plaintiff specifically.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/16/2001
- Decided 05/10/2001
- Published 05/10/2001
Judges
- COFFEY, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and COFFEY and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Edward T. Stein, Chicago, IL, David A. Novoselsky, Kevin S. Besetzny (argued), Novoselsky & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Nina G. Stillman (argued), Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.