United States Seventh Circuit
BRANNIGAN v. US, 01-1335
While 28 USC 2244(b)(2)(A) provides an independent reason for denying a successive application based on Apprendi, a court of appeals must deny an application that presents a claim omitted from a prior application, unless that claim was "previously unavailable" to the prisoner.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/07/2001
- Published 05/07/2001
Judges
- EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge., Before CUDAHY, POSNER, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Wayne A. Brannigan (submitted), Leavenworth, KS, pro se.
- For Appellees:
- K. Tate Chambers (submitted), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Peopria, IL, for respondent.