Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


BRANNIGAN v. US, 01-1335

While 28 USC 2244(b)(2)(A) provides an independent reason for denying a successive application based on Apprendi, a court of appeals must deny an application that presents a claim omitted from a prior application, unless that claim was "previously unavailable" to the prisoner.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/07/2001
  • Published 05/07/2001

Judges

  • EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge., Before CUDAHY, POSNER, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Wayne A. Brannigan (submitted), Leavenworth, KS, pro se.

  • For Appellees:
  • K. Tate Chambers (submitted), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Peopria, IL, for respondent.
Copied to clipboard