United States Seventh Circuit
US v. JOHNSON, 99-3902
The Court Interpreters Act, 28 USC 1827-28, gives the district court wide discretion in determining whether one or more interpreters is necessary for defendants' understanding of the proceedings and communication with counsel.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/26/2001
- Decided 04/23/2001
- Published 04/23/2001
Judges
- BAUER, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, POSNER, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Seventh Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Gregory T. Everts, Quarles & Brady, Madison, WI, Wilton Johnson, Beaumont TX, for Wilton Johnson., Erin C. Perkins (argued), Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Chicago, IL, for Jose Salazar., Wiliilam Berndt (argued), Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, for Javier Santa-Cruz., Victor F. Ciardelli, Kelly Q. Bennett (argued), Ciardelli & Cummings, Chicago, IL, Richard A. Canton, New York City, for Jesus Guzman.
- For Appellees:
- Markus Funk (argued and submitted), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellee.