US v. PAROLIN, 00-1676
Where defendant made no affirmative contention that his Pre-Sentencing Report was inaccurate, there is no reason to question the court's reliance upon it. A two-level sentence enhancement was appropriate under USSG 3A1.1(b)(1) for defrauding vulnerable and financially unsophisticated individuals.
- Argued 01/11/2001
- Decided 02/12/2001
- Published 02/12/2001
- FLAUM, Chief Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and CUDAHY and POSNER, Circuit Judges.
- United States Seventh Circuit
- For Appellees:
- Jacqueline O. Stern (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Crim. Div., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Kent R. Carlson (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.