United States Seventh Circuit

A sub-subcontractor need not give a contractor notice that includes an explicit demand for payment under the Miller Act, 40 USC 270b(a), since the statute's express requirements suffice.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/03/2000
• Decided 01/10/2001
• Published 01/10/2001

Judges

• EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge., Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and EASTERBROOK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James E. Sullivan,David S. Craig (argued), Cox, Zwerner, Gambill & Sullivan, Terre Haute, IN, for plaintiffs-appellants., Richard S. Pitts (argued), Richard W. McMinn, Hoffman, Drewry & Simmons, Indianapolis, IN, for Seaboard Surety Co., Austin Corp. and EUI Corp., Sue Hendricks Bailey, Marsha C. Massey (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty, Indianapolis, IN, for United States Postal Service.