Skip to main content

United States Seventh Circuit


US v. PERGLER, 99-3879

Defendant convicted of mail fraud, money laundering, and submitting false claims fraudulently bill Medicare for incontinence products failed to show attorneys giving him advice while he engaged in Medicaid fraud had a conflict-of-interest with criminal defense attorneys at same firm.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/04/2000
  • Published 12/04/2000

Judges

  • BAUER, Circuit Judge., Before BAUER, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Seventh Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Reid J. Schar (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Robert M. Andalman (argued), Altheimer & Gray, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard