Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Peebles, 09-1986

District court's imposition of a ten-month sentence upon a defendant for violating the conditions of her supervised release is vacated and remanded for resentencing as defendant's sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court did not calculate the appropriate guideline range and because it is impossible to determine with certainty what sentencing range the district court relied on and whether the district court meant to impose a sentence within or above that range.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/04/2010
  • Published 11/04/2010

Judges

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard