United States Sixth Circuit
Durr v. Cordray, 10-3463
In a death row inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit challenging Ohio's denial of access to certain physical evidence for purposes of DNA testing, district court's determination that the action is a second or successive habeas petition was in err, but defendant's motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction staying his execution is nonetheless denied as even if defendant were to prevail on his section 1983 claims, he would not be entitled to this remedy.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/19/2010
- Published 04/19/2010
Judges
- Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; SUHRHEINRICH and COLE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Carrie L. Davis, American Civil Liberties Union Of Ohio, Cleveland, OH, Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, NM, Dennis Lyle Sipe, Buell & Sipe, Marietta, OH, for Darryl M. Durr.