Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Durr v. Cordray, 10-3463

In a death row inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit challenging Ohio's denial of access to certain physical evidence for purposes of DNA testing, district court's determination that the action is a second or successive habeas petition was in err, but defendant's motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction staying his execution is nonetheless denied as even if defendant were to prevail on his section 1983 claims, he would not be entitled to this remedy.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/19/2010
  • Published 04/19/2010

Judges

  • Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; SUHRHEINRICH and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Carrie L. Davis, American Civil Liberties Union Of Ohio, Cleveland, OH, Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, NM, Dennis Lyle Sipe, Buell & Sipe, Marietta, OH, for Darryl M. Durr.

Copied to clipboard