United States Sixth Circuit

District court's post-judgment order denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction is affirmed as the appeal lacked merit and 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is not a vehicle for convicts to raise unrelated sentencing challenges that they had previously overlooked or omitted.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/28/2009
• Published 09/28/2009

Judges

• Before BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; SUHRHEINRICH and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ON BRIEF:Sharon A. Turek, Federal Public Defender's Office, Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. Mark V. Courtade, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.