Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Geiger v. Tower Automotive, 08-1314

In an Age Discrimination in Employment Act action claiming discriminatory termination, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) there was no evidence to indicate that plaintiff's supervisor's allegedly discriminatory mindset resulted in any adverse employment action; and 2) plaintiff was not replaced by another worker and was terminated as part of a reduction in force.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/01/2009
  • Decided 09/04/2009
  • Published 09/04/2009

Judges

  • Before; KENNEDY, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:Richard A. Meier, Law Office, Farmington Hills, Michigan, for Appellant. Philip B. Phillips, Foley & Lardner LLP, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF:Richard A. Meier, Law Office, Farmington Hills, Michigan, for Appellant. Philip B. Phillips, Jennifer L. Neumann, Foley & Lardner LLP, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard