Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. Deitz, 05-3410

Defendant's drug conviction and sentence are affirmed, where 1) there was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for the narcotics conspiracy; 2) a confidential informant's statements were not hearsay because they were not offered to establish the truth of the matter asserted; and 3) defendant's sentence properly calculated his criminal history score.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/20/2009
  • Published 08/20/2009

Judges

  • Before:  COLE and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  CLELAND, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.  Joseph R. Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.  Joseph R. Wilson, Ava M.R. Dustin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard