United States Sixth Circuit
US v. Deitz, 05-3410
Defendant's drug conviction and sentence are affirmed, where 1) there was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for the narcotics conspiracy; 2) a confidential informant's statements were not hearsay because they were not offered to establish the truth of the matter asserted; and 3) defendant's sentence properly calculated his criminal history score.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/20/2009
- Published 08/20/2009
Judges
- Before: COLE and CLAY, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Joseph R. Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Dennis C. Belli, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Joseph R. Wilson, Ava M.R. Dustin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee.