United States Sixth Circuit

In a drug prosecution, the District Court's grant of Defendant's motion to suppress evidence of calls made to Defendant is reversed, where the evidence was not hearsay because the government did not seek to prove the truth of any of the matters asserted by the callers.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/06/2009
• Published 05/06/2009

Judges

• Before:  KENNEDY, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  John E. Kuhn, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.  David S. Mejia, Law Offices, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  John E. Kuhn, Jr., Terry M. Cushing, Monica Wheatley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.  David S. Mejia, Law Offices, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.