Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


Durand v. Hanover Ins. Grp., Inc., 07-6468

In an ERISA action based on Defendants' calculation of lump-sum benefits under their pension plan, dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is reversed, where the exhaustion of further remedies by Plaintiff would have been futile.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/18/2009
  • Published 03/18/2009

Judges

  • Before NORRIS, ROGERS, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Eli Gottesdiener, Gottesdiener Law Firm, Brooklyn, New York, for Appellant.  Alan S. Gilbert, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  Eli Gottesdiener, Gottesdiener Law Firm, Brooklyn, New York, E. Douglas Richards, E. Douglas Richards, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellant.  Alan S. Gilbert, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, Illinois, Richard H.C. Clay, Angela Logan Edwards, Lisa H. Thomas, Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard